Conflicts of Interest amongst Parts Locator Marketplaces June 14, 2011
Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, eBusiness Applications/Services, International Business Development, Internet Marketing, Online Supply Chain Management.Tags: Aerospace, eBusiness, International Business, Parts Locator, Website
11 comments
In my recent blog post titled “The challenges of online aeronautical parts locator systems”, I asked if it is ethical for a parts locator marketplace to be affiliated with an actual part reseller. In this post I am analyzing this potential conflict of interest in more details.
For a parts distributor to be successful, they need to:
- Effectively manage the inventory they keep: Distributors must avoid stocking parts that will stay on the shelf for too long, tying up valuable capital. But they also
want to have a large enough inventory to become a preferred “one stop shop” for customers. For example, they want to know when to get rid of OEM parts when an
equivalent but more readily available PMA part becomes available. Or, they want to know when to hold on to that rare part that is impossible to find. - Price the parts based on market pressures: Distributors want to know when to increase the price of parts that are hard to find and when to lower the prices of parts
that are tying up shelf space unnecessarily. For example, if the FAA issues a mandatory service bulletin, distributors know that some parts will be in high
demand and they might want to increase their margins. - Stay ahead of the competition: Because the aviation aftermarket parts industry is so fragmented, it accounts for hundreds and hundreds of parts distributors
or resellers. These companies range from a couple of employees to multi-national conglomerates. Competition is fierce and the pressure is on to surpass or eliminate competition at all costs.
The analytics required to achieve these goals are pretty straight forward:
- What are the parts most in demand: distributors want to know what parts buyers are looking for. More importantly, they want to find out which parts are not found.
- Who has the parts available: distributors want to know which of their competitors have the parts inventory. They want to know quantities and locations to be able
to adjust their own inventory. - What is the market price of the part: distributors want to know what others are charging for the parts they have in inventory to be able to adjust their own
price to the market.
Online parts locator marketplaces often advertise that they process thousands of searches and RFQs per day, thus generating the exact data that a distributor would need to dominate the market. The data mining possibilities of such websites affords a unique vision into the key tendencies of the Aviation Aftermarket.
This is analogue to the data that credit cards company collect on the consumer side. However, credit card companies are regulated and are FORBIDDEN from using the personal information they collect. Such rules are outlined in their Data Privacy Statement. Supermarket chains like WALMART also collect such data to manage their operation and apply pressure on their suppliers. However, they keep that data for themselves and are not about to share it with any of their competitors.
In the Aviation industry, not only is there no regulations about this subject, but thousands of distributors VOLUNTARELY provide this information through online parts locator marketplaces directly owned by some competitors. This means that distributors, manufacturers or resellers using these systems indirectly provide their competitors with a view of their
inventory, availability, and pricing in a data format easily analyzed and interpreted. Also, buyers should be concerned about trusting the search results they receive when they are looking for a part that the marketplace owner actually has in inventory. Will the buyer receive independent results or will he be “guided” towards a specific answer?
So to make sure that you avoid these conflicts of interest, perform these two checks before deciding what marketplace to use either as a buyer or a seller:
- Be sure to research the background and affiliation of each marketplace. You will be surprised how some of these websites don’t provide you ANY information about
their ownership or business background (Check out gemaviation.com as a good “mystery” business). The more transparent they are about whom they are the better. Make sure you know the actual business entity (e.g. Inc., LLC, GmbH) and who the key executives are before proceeding. Here is an affiliation list of the most common Parts Locator marketplaces:
|
Marketplace |
Affiliation |
| ABDonline.com | Air Service Directory |
| AeroXchange.com | 13 Major Airlines |
| Airparts.com | Turbine World International |
| APLS.com | Defense Solutions Group |
| Avmarkets.com | Av-tools.com |
| Dataccess.net | Independent |
| fipart.com | Independent |
| ILSmart.com | Aviall/Boeing |
| Locatory.com | Avia Solutions Group |
| OneAero.com | Independent |
| Partbase.com | Independent |
| Partslogistics.com | DakotaAirParts |
| RHOBI.com | Independent |
| Spec2000.com | Air Transport Association |
| Stockmarket.aero | Component Control |
- Check out the Terms & Conditions and Data Privacy documents. These documents should be readily available (usually linked at the bottom of the page). You
will be shocked at what some of these sites will do with your data. Most of them bind you to these terms from the moment you log in. Be sure to read both documents as there is usually confidentiality and data usage clauses in both of them.
The aviation aftermarket industry is still one of the most immature industries when it comes to using the web efficiently. The large number of parts locator marketplace and their wide range of quality and professionalism are a good indication that things need to improve. Industries that have gain much efficiency through the use of internet and marketplaces have done so through transparency and quality. In my opinion these are the two things that we should improve in the Aviation Aftermarket.
Full Disclosure: Although this blog represents his own personal opinions, Ludo Van Vooren is the VP of Customer Solutions for fipart.com, an independent parts locator marketplace.
The challenges of online aeronautical parts locator systems February 17, 2011
Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, eBusiness Applications/Services, International Business Development, Internet Marketing, Online Supply Chain Management.Tags: Aerospace, Change Management, eBusiness, International Business, LinkedIn
3 comments
A recent magazine article (PDF) and subsequent post on LinkedIn started an interesting discussion regarding the phantom inventories that have plagued most Aviation Parts Locator services for many years. The contributors argued that integrated inventory systems and/or feedback functions could potentially help with the problem.
Phantom inventories, the exaggerated or completely fake listing of parts, quantities, or condition code, is just one of the issues faced by these systems. As a buyer, you might find that your RFQs do not get answered. Of course, this is also one of the only industries where prices are still not published and a buyer actually has to ask for the privilege of spending their money. For suppliers, there is the frustration of distinguishing themselves from their lesser quality competitors. Also, most suppliers receive many “price fishing RFQs” from pretend buyers not really interested in doing business.
So although I sympathize with the opinions of those who commented, the issue is really related to dishonesty in the industry. Phantom inventory can be managed equally in an integrated system than in an excel spreadsheet. Until dishonest or at least misleading suppliers, buyers, and parts locator platforms are exposed and driven out, there will be little progress. This can only be achieved through transparency, quality, and community.
First, we should work to get rid of misleading online parts locator services. As the article pointed out, some of these platforms continuously reload inventories that were previously deleted. They also steal information from other platforms, or harass potential subscribers with incessant phone calls. Let’s expose these companies in forums such as LinkedIn and let the community know. Also, we should request transparency from these platforms. Is it ethical for an open parts locator service to be affiliated with an actual part reseller? Can the search results really be trusted? Isn’t there an inherent conflict of interest? Let’s ask that these platforms disclose their ownership and other business activities. If they refuse, we can do it for them. Finally, it should be clear what each platform charges for subscription and why they feel it is worth it. Why is it that subscription price is such a mystery with these platforms?
Talking about pricing, we should demand price transparency from suppliers. A part in a specific condition with specific documentation should have a fixed price. The only difference between suppliers should be availability and delivery. We should be able to see part prices immediately and just get a quote for delivery. There is no reason part prices should be secret. That business model has passed. Serious suppliers should embrace transparency and quality so they drive away the misleading suppliers that list phantom inventory. Even if dishonest suppliers list the same prices, they won’t be able to beat the delivery time and handling quality of suppliers who actually have the part. So let’s reward transparency by doing more business with suppliers that list prices in locator services.
By doing so, we will also drive away the fake buyers. If prices are displayed, there is no reason for price fishing. There is also a better feeling from the buyer that they are not being “price raped” when dealing with AOG situations. Only delivery should be more expensive in this case, not the actual part price. This will create a more efficient process, with better quality and competition.
The advantage of doing business in the 21st century in a relatively small industry such as Aviation, is that the community can yield enormous power over outdated and efficient business processes. So instead of creating technology to fix an old process, online parts locator services should use technology to change the industry through transparency, quality and community. And as members of the community, it is now our responsibility to make this happen.
Connecting the World: Three Applications for International eBusiness Collaboration April 20, 2009
Posted by ludozone in eBusiness Applications/Services, International Business Development, Online Supply Chain Management.Tags: Dassault Systemes, eBusiness, eSourcing, Exostar, Export Control, International Business, Online Collaboration, Oracle
add a comment
With the globalization of the Aerospace and Defense (A&D) industry, the international portion of a company’s business will continue to grow and become more complex than ever. Managing export control of restricted non-tangible items, sourcing products and services qualifying for offset credits, or taking advantage multi-time zone workday are three examples of how internet applications can help.
Export Control Management
With renewed emphasis by the government of the United States and United Kingdom on the control of information and technology export to other nations, many A&D companies are increasing their level of diligence on this matter. Rules and regulations in this area require careful planning, control, and tracking of the distribution of information related to military technology declared “sensitive” by the government. Any breach of these regulations can result in severe monetary penalties or even federal charges resulting in imprisonment.
Using secure multi-enterprise collaboration tools (e.g. Exostar ForumPass), companies can take advantage of the identity management, access control, and full audit tracking functionalities of the solution to meet the requirements of Export Control. A company can insure that only users for which it has obtained export control license are invited to the project. Any data that needs to be shared with the targeted partners can be “tagged” for export. This triggers the workflow function of the tool which alerts the export control officer. The officer can then review the data and approve or reject access by the desired companies. The whole process is tracked and recorded electronically, should any of this information be required by government auditors.
Multi-time Zone Workday
With A&D partners located throughout the world, there is now an opportunity to take advantage of the geographic position of some companies to achieve tremendous growth in productivity. This is particularly important in the domain of engineering design.
Using multi-enterprise collaboration tools (e.g. Dassault Systemes ENOVIA) to combine the work of engineers located in different parts of the world to achieve a near continuous multi-time zone workday. For example, an engineer in the UK can check-in his design work into the system at the end of the day. This work is then picked up by a colleague in Seattle at the beginning of her work day. When she is done, the updated work gets checked back into the system where a third colleague in Japan picks it up upon arriving to work. At the end of his day, the completed work gets reviewed by the original engineer back in the UK just back to work in the morning. This means a UK project could achieve nearly 24 hours of engineering work in any calendar day, potentially reducing a design project from months to a mere weeks.
Sourcing for Offset Credits
Many A&D companies selling equipment to foreign countries enter “offset” agreements that require them to reciprocate the original deal with the procurement of products and services from local suppliers. If the company does not meet these obligations, they are liable for major financial penalties which, by the way, do not relieve them from the original obligations. In addition, the “offset” obligation is often greater than the value of the original contract.
The main difficulty with buying from “local” suppliers in a foreign country is that the procurement department of the buying company does not recognize these suppliers as “approved” suppliers. In the past, including additional suppliers, especially foreign, in a request for bid was very time consuming and just not efficient.
Some companies are now using eSourcing tools (e.g. Oracle Sourcing) to help them with this problem. With this solution, sending a request for information (RFI) or even a request for quote (RFQ) to three “known” or to fifteen “international” suppliers takes about the same time. This means procurement executives can scan international supplier directories for suppliers in countries where offset obligations exist and include them in the requests. Of course, this solution does not work for all purchases especially when supplier reputation and track record are a major requirement. But all in all, companies have found enough “low risk” purchases in a year to derive noticeable offsets benefits from the solution.
Ludo Van Vooren, a 15 years veteran of the industry, blogs about eBusiness, Social Media, Internet Marketing, and International Business Development.